The Truly Retarded Part of Science

(Left:What I really think humans will look like 500 thousand years later, something he told us to draw out but I so happened to have something that fits perfectly)

Which came first the chicken or the egg, that was the first thing my new science teacher (Someone for the sake of his reputation I'm not going to name, but most of us know who he is anyway) asked. Before our dear sir told us the answer he gave us a big huge long assed explanation before actually giving us the answer which so happened to be....chicken. Now had my teacher still been Ms. Sara who was like an older sister to all in my form/class well, she wouldn't have spent so much time explaining the nonsense of "The Big Bang Theory" and would have just went for the chicken came first the question how ever of which came first was brought up because it was supposed to be asked as a question when getting interviewed to get into a uni or something.


Here's where I start off with the first of the truly retarded "The Big Bang Theory" the piece of garbage that was supposed to create the planets and our sun/star. Now it starts off like this, two big pieces of rock which are supposed to be 50 billion times the size of earth (I'm assuming bigger than the sun which is pretty obvious) collided and exploded which in theory created the forms of our planets which in turn caused life. The biggest problem I have with this theory is the fact that it involves an explosion that caused all life, doesn't take a brilliant rocket scientist with a degree in anatomy, physics and anything else got to do with the effects of an explosion to a human being to know what an explosion does to your body. If however you don't know go look at the pics of the bombing on Gaza see what happened to all those in the effective radius of a bomb, now we still can blame Bush for funding Israel but only untill the 20th of January, when that day does come we want "US President Obama" to do something about it but untill then just blame Bush. Another problem with this theory is that we have info on how stars are created as shown below:


"A star begins as a collapsing cloud of material composed primarily of hydrogen, along with helium and trace amounts of heavier elements. Once the stellar core is sufficiently dense, some of the hydrogen is steadily converted into helium through the process of nuclear fusion. The remainder of the star's interior carries energy away from the core through a combination of radiative and convective processes. The star's internal pressure prevents it from collapsing further under its own gravity. Once the hydrogen fuel at the core is exhausted, those stars having at least 0.4 times the mass of the Sun expand to become a red giant, in some cases fusing heavier elements at the core or in shells around the core. The star then evolves into a degenerate form, recycling a portion of the matter into the interstellar environment, where it will form a new generation of stars with a higher proportion of heavy elements."


Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/


Even if stars were created in the "Big Bang Theory's" method wouldn't we have a lot more debris floating arround the planets and stars, they're 50 billion times the size of the Earth for cryin' out loud, billion Earths don't just dissappear am I right? And had each of them really been 50 billion times the size of Earth I would seriously believe we would have alot more land and asteroids down here. And honestly what are the chances of a moon sized object hitting each planet to start their orbits and cause gravity, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune aren't even solid how exactly do you hit those and cause them to start their orbits. Those would probably be free floating molecules if the "Big Bang" actually did happen and was actually true, and besides its just a theory no one actually has any proof that its true.

This is the second and last thing about science I believe is retarded "The Theory of Evolution", its the theory made up of several nonsensical pieces of rubbish based on a few skeletons made up mainly of a chimpanzee skeleton, several deformed ape or human skeletons and a human skeleton. Its just insulting to know that our dear old Darwin could only come up with something as insulting as evolution, something as usless and insulting as calling us all a bunch of apes. Something our new science teacher pointed out to us was our tailbones, according to him we used to have tails but maybe its just there and you still do feel pain if you land on it. Unfortunatly that's all I can think of on Darwin, and the moral of the story here is we need Ms. Sara back I'm sure everyone prefers that. Scientology just there to scare the crap out of you.

Hope you all enjoyed it,
Alex